scholar_vit (scholar_vit) wrote,
scholar_vit
scholar_vit

И опять о профессионализме и компетентности

Я уже цитировал сегодня статью с первой полосы Washington Post, после чтения которой возникают сомнения в компетентности наших следователей и администрации, которая писала для них инструкции.

После работы дочитал тот же номер -- и пожалуйста, ещё одна статья, на этот раз о ядерном договоре с Индией. Вот цитатка:

First, the Bush administration made two amateurish mistakes in the way it brought this agreement to the world's attention. One was announcing the agreement just days before the resumption of six-party talks over the fate of North Korea's nuclear arsenal. For the past few years, the United States has struggle to convince China that North Korea, its ally, should be punished for violating the NPT. Yet just before the six-party talks began, the Bush administration declared that our ally India would not be punished for its refusal to join the NPT. This clearly undermines our ability to secure China's much-needed cooperation in denuclearizing North Korea.

The Bush administration's second error was announcing its agreement before having secured the necessary congressional approval. The initial reaction from Capitol Hill has not been encouraging: Members of the energy conference committee in the House have already approved a measure that would make it illegal for the United States to export nuclear technology to India, and Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) has cautiously remarked, "We're going to have a lot of conversations."

Such conversations ought to have taken place before the agreement was made public. The instant we announced our willingness to disregard the NPT, we forever undermined its coercive power. But we will not receive any of the strategic benefits of a strengthened India without congressional approval. Thus, we could end up paying the cost for the agreement without reaping any of its rewards.


Дальше авторы доказывают, что соглашение с Индией нам стратегически вредно. Не знаю, я не специалист -- хотя мне кажется, что подрывать без крайней необходимости NPT граничит с безответственностью. Что-то это смахивает на очередную победу идеологии ("мы против многосторонних договоров в принципе") над здравым смыслом. Но в любом случае -- зачем было делать так топорно?

Ладно, я не согласен с неоконами в принципе -- но зачем они делают ещё и ненужные ошибки?

Банда безграмотных самовлюблённых менеджеров разрушила не одну компанию.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 28 comments